Details
Details
Firuzkuh 92
Silver (given following internal peer review)
Physical Description
Complete, black ink
3
Content
Legal query (istiftā) regarding whether a judge can compel the buyer’s representative to return the seller’s payment following the annulment of a transaction. The annulment was carried out willingly by the seller, and the buyer (the nephew) accepted it without raising any claims against the seller. The response rules that the judge does not have the authority to enforce such a repayment.
Dates
- The Gregorian calendar: None
People
Publications
Related Shelfmarks
IEDC Data
1172
26/01/2025
25/02/2025
Citations
Ofir Haim
Nabi Saqee
The transcription has been revised from a previous publication (see Publications), the translation is the original work of the IEDC Team (as yet unpublished in peer-review print)
Images of this Text displayed on this web page are provided by Nabi Saqee.
© Nabi Saqee, All rights reserved.
If you wish to reproduce these images please contact Nabi Saqee.
© Nabi Saqee, All rights reserved.
If you wish to reproduce these images please contact Nabi Saqee.
Contact
invisible_east@conted.ox.ac.uk (Please include the above permalink when contacting the editorial team about this Text)
